Toronto Danforth By-Election Date March 19, 2012 – All Candidates Debate March 15/12

Bulletin!! Candidate information for the March 15/12 – Toronto Danforth Debate

Learn:

– what the parties are saying!

– what the candidates are doing!

– what the voters are thinking!

Toronto Danforth Candidates Debate – Thursday March 15, 2012 – 7:00 p.m. – 9:00 p.m. – Don Mills United Church – 126 O’Connor

Meet Your Candidates

The date is rapidly approaching. Toronto Danforth is headed for another election to replace Jack Layton. The sentiment is that whoever replaces Jack will have “big shoes to fill”. Well maybe, but remember that the new MP for Toronto Danforth will NOT be a party leader. As a result,  this upcoming by-election is an opportunity for Toronto Danforth to elect an MP who will represent Toronto Danforth. Because of Jack’s responsibilities as NDP leader, Jack focused his energy on being NDP leader. He did not participate in the Toronto Danforth election debates. His non-attendance triggered resentment among (at least some) Toronto Danforth residents. But, it’s time to move on and elect a new MP. Toronto Danforth has an interesting and engaging group of candidates. Let’s also hope for a higher voter turnout. Come meet your candidates in the March 15 Toronto Danforht All Candidates Debate as follows:

Thursday March 15 – 7:00 p.m. – 9:00 p.m. – Don Mills United Church – 126 O’Connor

Ten of the eleven candidates have confirmed their attendance – Conservative Andrew Keyes has not yet confirmed

Here is the list of candidates who have registered with Elections Canada. To learn more about our candidates read on Continue reading Toronto Danforth By-Election Date March 19, 2012 – All Candidates Debate March 15/12

Advertisements

Toronto Danforth mystery candidate …

In the 2006 and 2008 elections the Conservative Party garnered roughly 10% of the vote.  Of course they have never tried very hard in Toronto Danforth. I suspect  that  if they ran a strong candidate they would do much better. For 2011 the Conservatives have a “name on the ballot” and nothing more.

Check  out the following article:

“Not long after she was invited to the debate for Toronto-Danforth, Conservative candidate Katarina von Koenig sent her regrets.

“It was almost instant, within 24 hours,” …

Read the complete article  here.

Jack Layton hosts “Town Hall” meeting in Toronto Centre instead of in Toronto Danforth

Mr. Layton was unwilling to attend a Candidates in his own riding of Toronto Danforth. He was however willing to host a “town hall” event in the neighbouring riding of Toronto Centre. This took place on Tuesday April 26/11.  Why not hold this in Toronto Danforth? It’s hard to not see as holding his own riding in contempt!

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/306040

Continue reading Jack Layton hosts “Town Hall” meeting in Toronto Centre instead of in Toronto Danforth

The Polls Summary – Candidates, Leaders and Parties – It Has Been Interesting

The Toronto Danforth Candidates debate is tomorrow night – April  28, 2011 starting at 8:00 p.m. The doors will be  open by 7:30 p.m. Don’t forget to bring your questions. Once again the location is:

Don Mills United  Church – 126 O’Connor

As part of  the process  of organizing this event (and it has not always been easy) we have presented  you with a series of polls. For the most  part  these polls have  been to learn views about what is most  important in the campaign. Is it  the party, the leader or  the candidate? Should your MP live in your riding? The questions and results have been interesting.

Here are the questions and responses:

Should your MP live  in the Toronto Danforth  riding?

This was evenly split between  those  who think residency should be a requirement and those who don’t think the question was  relevant. A small  minority (1 in 9) think that the candidate should not be required to live  in the riding. For the record, three of the five candidates live  in Toronto  Danforth. These are the three who will be participating in the debate.

Should “All” candidates  be invited to a Candidates debate?

Two thirds think  that all candidates  should be  invited and one  third  think that only the candidates of registered parties  should  be invited. Of course we invited all five candidates to participate. The Conservative and NDP candidates declined our invitation. Interestingly, neither the Conservative nor NDP candidate appeared on the Goldhawk debate on April  26. In some ridings, it  has been very difficult for  Independent and “Fringe Party” (whatever that means – did the Conservatives become a “Fringe Party” in 1993?) candidates to participate.

On this note – here is an excerpt from one of the posts on this blog:

All-candidate meetings/debates should be for all registered candidates. Independent candidates are a truer species of democratic candidate and should always be encouraged to participate.”

Should candidates be required  to attend candidates’ debates?

A full 88.89% think that candidates should be  required  to attend. The  remaining minority think it should be  a decision of the candidate. We agree. It’s too bad that Toronto  Danforth residents will not get the chance to see all  the candidates together. Hey, we tried.

Should candidates make themselves available to the media?

80% of you think candidates should make  themselves available  to the media. The remaining think that  the party should  control whether candidates  engage with the media. We have  been unable to locate a single appearance or media interview  that  included  the Conservative candidate in Toronto Danforth.

Should the name of the party (party affiliation) be placed  beside the name of the candidate on the ballot?

Interestingly 2/3  think  that the party affiliation should be  place  beside the candidate. 1/6 think that only  the name of the Candidate should appear.  Interestingly, 1/6 think that only the name of the party leader should  appear. As  you know that party affiliation of the candidate will  appear  on the ballot. You might not  know, that  this is a fairly recent development. Prior to 1972 only the name  of the candidate was  on the ballot. Does that suggest (as many think it does) that the individual candidates have become less  and less relevant?

Did you miss the Toronto Danforth Debate on Goldhawk?

If you did, not to worry.

It will be shown again at 9:00 a.m. – Wednesday April 27 – Rogers Cable 10

Neither the Conservatives nor the NDP bothered to appear on Goldhawk.  The NDP and Conservative candidates continue their status as being:

“names on the ballot” but not “candidates”.

If you missed Goldhawk – check it out on April 27 at 9:00 a.m.

Should the name of the party be placed beside the Candidate on the ballot?

Consider the following:

“Since 1972 the candidate’s party has appeared after his or her name on the ballot. A candidate wishing to be endorsed by a registered political party and have the party’s name appear on the ballot must include a letter of endorsement signed by the leader of the party or by a designated party representative.

Otherwise the prospective candidate must include whether he or she wants to be designated as “Independent” on the ballot or to have no designation at all appear on the ballot. In Canadian federal elections most candidates are judged by their affiliation with a political party. It is difficult and rare for an Independent or unaffiliated candidate to be elected.”

http://canadaonline.about.com/od/federalelections/g/candidate-federal-election.htmContinue reading Should the name of the party be placed beside the Candidate on the ballot?

Should candidates make themselves available to the media?

“In Toronto-Danforth, NDP leader Jack Layton’s riding, the Starwas not able to visit Conservative candidate Katarina Von Koenig’s campaign office. A staffer said she does not yet have one.

The staffer declined to let Von Koenig be interviewed in person “on the advice of my national headquarters,” offering instead to submit written questions to the candidate through him.

The Star did not accept. Most other downtown Conservative candidates agreed to be interviewed face to face, some with no advance warning.”

http://www.thestar.com/mobile/gta/article/975539

Continue reading Should candidates make themselves available to the media?